Drug Price Negotiation Proposals Undermine Current Bipartisan Approaches to Lower Drug Spending

Congress is actively seeking to advance legislation to allow the Medicare program to “negotiate” the prices of brand drugs. However, these proposals neglect to consider the impact on the development of lower-cost generic and biosimilar medicines. These safe and equally efficacious medicines continue to offer lower costs and increased access to care, but the drug price negotiation proposals would actively harm millions of patients by rewarding brand drug manufacturers with a perpetual monopoly in many instances. And even further they include unrealistic timelines for generic and biosimilar manufacturers to be able to bring new, more affordable medicines to patients.

That’s not all. A great irony of these efforts is they not only ignore successful legislative approaches to reduce drug spend through competition as established by the Hatch-Waxman Act. But they also ignore better and bipartisan options to sustainably lower drug prices by encouraging generic and biosimilar adoption.

For instance, one of the challenges to the adoption of lower cost generics and biosimilars is the well-documented, recent trend of abuses of the patent system. As an example, numerous commentators have observed AbbVie has “secured more than 100 patents to prevent anyone from attempting to copy” Humira®,1 the world’s highest selling pharmaceutical product that brings in more revenue than all NFL teams combined.2

In a recent letter, Kathi Vidal, the Director of the PTO, committed to focus on precisely these types of issues, noting that the PTO intended to “ensur[e] that [the] patent system promotes research and development and protects innovation while not incentivizing, protecting, or permitting activity that will improperly or unnecessarily delay access to low-cost medicines.”3 As part of that letter, the PTO states it is implementing a number of procedures and policies to help ensure that access to low-cost medicines is not delayed. Congress is also considering bipartisan legislation that would enhance the PTO’s ability to take a second look at patents that should not have been granted through a process known as inter partes review.4

Likewise, numerous observers, including MedPAC and the HHS Inspector General (OIG), have highlighted the manner in which Medicare rewards plans for pushing patients to use higher priced medicines. In fact on average, newly approved first generics launched in 2020 but by only 21% of Medicare Part D plans. And while the BBB includes provisions to update the design of the Medicare prescription drug program, those could be strengthened by previously introduced legislation that creates effective incentives for plans to use lower cost medicines – either through changes to plan liability or by ensuring that plans and their PBMs cover new generics and biosimilars and place generics on generic tiers.

Given the immense impact the generics and biosimilars industry has on providing savings for drug expenditures, it is clear that as the nation’s policymakers work towards the goal of sustaining access to affordable pharmaceutical care for all, this is a set of negotiations that we can’t afford.

Share Your Voice

Tell Congress to protect access to your safe, affordable generic and biosimilar medicines.

Take Action

Craig Burton

By Craig Burton, Senior Vice President, Policy and Strategic Alliances
Executive Director, Biosimilars Council
Published on July 25, 2022



  1. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-09-07/this-shield-of-patents-protects-the-world-s-best-selling-drug
  2. https://patientsforaffordabledrugsnow.org/
  3. Letter from PTO to FDA (July 6, 2022) at 3 (emphasis added).
  4. See Patent Trial and Appeal Board Reform Act of 2022.


Association for Accessible Medicines


Sign-up for Updates

Receive relevant industry news, event information and the latest resources on biosimilars and generic medicines.

Stay Connected

For the latest updates, follow us on social media.